Dealing of Misconduct
Retraction Policy
The Editor-in-Chief of Kertas of Multidisciplinary Humanitarian Science (KMHS) may consider the retraction of a published article under specific circumstances to maintain the integrity of the scholarly record.
Grounds for Retraction
An article may be retracted if:
-
There is clear evidence that the findings are unreliable due to major error (e.g., flawed methodology, miscalculation) or misconduct (e.g., data fabrication, image manipulation).
-
The article involves plagiarism.
-
The findings have been published elsewhere without proper citation, permission, or acknowledgment (i.e., redundant or duplicate publication).
-
The article includes unauthorized use of data, materials, or third-party content.
-
Legal concerns arise, such as copyright infringement, libel, breach of privacy, or defamation.
-
The research violates recognized ethical standards.
-
The article was accepted or published based on a manipulated or compromised peer-review process.
-
A significant conflict of interest was not disclosed and may have unduly influenced editorial or review decisions.
Retraction Notice Guidelines
When a retraction is warranted:
-
A formal retraction notice will be issued and linked to all online versions of the retracted article.
-
The notice will clearly identify the retracted article by title, author(s), and DOI.
-
The document will be explicitly labeled as a “Retraction” to avoid confusion with other types of notices (e.g., errata or editorial comments).
-
Retraction notices will be published promptly to limit the dissemination of potentially misleading or harmful information.
-
Retraction notices will be open access and publicly available without subscription or payment barriers.
-
The notice will specify who is issuing the retraction (e.g., author, editor, or publisher).
-
The reason(s) for retraction will be stated in clear, factual, and objective language.
When Retractions Are Not Appropriate
KMHS will not normally issue a retraction when:
-
There is a dispute over authorship without concerns about the validity of the findings.
-
The article contains minor errors that do not affect the core results or conclusions; in such cases, a correction will be issued instead.
-
Allegations of misconduct are under investigation, and the evidence is inconclusive or pending.
-
Conflicts of interest were disclosed after publication, but they are judged not to have affected the integrity or interpretation of the work.